Luo new that, as the to guide the program in both a good and positive results to compromise. For the current program, to say the To be sure,abercrombie paris, From the original program design, we are very understanding of animal protection for the animal protection act. Just looking through this program to tell them to use extreme methods to solve the problem, does not help solve the problem of animal protection.
reported,doudoune pyrenex, Dragon TV But then, some conservationists believe that the hurled insults, and microblogging him strong words of criticism,Abercrombie, to the program director's work has brought great inconvenience. Thus, the Wrong? Luo new host this has something to say:
protected animals can not ignore the people's convention
We all know that Americans eat turkey, in the that their kindness, but finally asked to eat does not wrong. Think about this why? In fact, the protection of abandoned pet dogs, pet cats and dogs to protect people's food culture,coach outlet online, is an entirely different proposition. Some traders do have a dog who has not behaving honorably, they are selling stolen dogs, even dogs poisoned with poison. But this is not against the consumption of dog breeding grounds can not beat him to death all those who eat dog meat and other reasons.
alone the animal protectors But they did not get more support. This is because they are caused by the behavior of the social order of chaos. We blame their high-speed Blocking behavior misconduct, not to protect animal itself misconduct. But some conservationists do not understand this, mistakenly believe that even a deliberate distortion of the program director for some of the inappropriate .
we all know, human consumption of pork, dog or cat meat, etc., are already many years of history? Between humans and other animals, there is no absolute equality, ignoring the people's convention is very unfair. Luo new view, not because I was protected species, so there I was just,doudoune moncler femme, I do not agree with any view other people who are unjust,Moncler, then the so-called subject to the so-called Just think, 'I am God, my God, that is,piumini moncler, We must ask: do not even respect its own kind, he can really go to protect animals?
for this, Luo a new record this week in the broadcast The law is a 'discipline' in this 'dog eat dog or is it' argument, the root cause is that many people confuse the boundaries between the two for people who eat dog meat, to improve their ethical threshold, For dog lovers are concerned,moncler piumini, as places of legal action rather than moral bottom line with a radical moral outrage, ignoring the culture and the reality of who stress that 'protection', will inevitably result in 'potential,doudoune moncler, such as fire and water' the confrontation, and have actually not conducive to to promote animal protection concept. Similarly, in the 'eating dog meat' issues, production, processing,moncler, consumption and a series of links and highlights the many weaknesses in the legal system, needs to be improved. Short replied:
show understanding of animal protection but must comply with the law
Related articles：
