I never forget the first Tea Party protest I went to April of 2009 that was organized by a handful of Loyola students. I went in expecting to hear about bank bailouts and was shocked by people stumping about immigration, abortion, and Obama. OWS has spent time debating how to be more accommodating to different genders and sexual orientations, and has workshops this week on privilege and privilege. What does any of that Cheap Burberry Scarf have to do with the collusion between business and government? I suspect OWS is enjoying popularity that the Tea Party never did because they are trumpeting the heart of Marxism: class conflict, or class analysis. 3 years after the bailouts it is becoming clear that there is a small class of people, many of whom were bailed out, who are doing better than ever, and everyone else is doing somewhere Fake Burberry Scarf between no better, and much worse. A recent study showed that not Burberry Scarf Fake only is unemployment stuck at 9-10%, but that median household income has fallen 10% since Dec. 2007, two thirds of the income drop has happened since the unemployment rate stabilized, representing that even the employed are earning less. Such an income decline hasn happened since the Great Depression. It is truly unfortunate that Marx owns class analysis, for it opens the door to anyone exploring it to be labeled a Marxist, even when one is only pointing out that the reason for such income inequality is explicitly because free market (not to mention competitive market) principles were abandoned. Be it Washington DC highest median household income, New York City millionaire and billionaire bankers who profit from the industry with the most government privilege of all, Hollywood exotic cars and mansions made possible by the force of government and copyright law, pharmaceutical companies who use the force of government to monopolize public research, pro-athletes and musicians who are aided by the force of government to turn non-scarce goods into scarce goods, or doctors and lawyers who use state-sponsored cartels to limit competition and inflate their wages, there are very few people in America who are that don enjoy some sort of government privilege that falls well outside the laissez-faire economy that Adam Smith envisioned. whole of the advantages and disadvantages of the different employments of labour and stock, must, in the same neighbourhood, be either perfectly equal, or continually trending to equality at least, would be the case in a society where things were left to follow their natural course, where there was perfect liberty, and where every man was perfectly free both to choose what occupation he thought proper, and to change it as often as he thought proper. 18th Century laissez-faire socialist. Extreme income inequality in and of itself is not a problem, it is however a sign that there may be a problem. It kind of like a Replica Burberry Scarf check engine light. It is how that income inequality is produced that is the problem, for much of it borders on outright theft. Hopefully even the most ardent free market Republican would not accept income inequality that was the product of outright theft. There is somehow the perception that those on the top of the American pyramid scheme got there through hard work and building a better mousetrap, but many got there by using government to limit competition, or even more brazenly Burberry Scarf took it right from the public treasury. Finally, OWS has done the hard work of shining a spotlight at this issue, but the time has come to replace the communists who have spearheaded this movement with more moderate voices who can coalesce around ending crony-capitalism.