In November of 2000 when the NASDAQ was trading at 3000 I wrote in this column that the NASDAQ Index would fall to 1500 and I got lots of heat for mentioning it. Microsoft had fallen from $129 to $60 per share. You know where they are today.,abercrombie and fitch paris

The talking heads on CNBC-TV and many of the radio stock experts are convinced we are brained back up as presently as this small ?orrection?is over ?and they could be right,moncler, but I appear to remember their sometime predictions fair ahead the major stock indexes went over the edge of Financial Niagara Falls. Can it occur anew since the market has fallen so far?

For a year the DOW has been crouching higher. The NASDAQ has acquired back about 40%,abercrombie paris, yet please memorize the NASDAQ Index is not composed of the same stocks as it was 3 years ago and neither is the DOW. Many companies went bankrupt and others have been delisted because they do not meet the criteria to remain above the board.

Too many investors have not done their assignment. Most of them merely know the excellent bull market of 1982 to 2000. The same goes for brokers. Almost naught have ever discerned a bear market. I cry the mutual fund managers ?hildren?for maximum of them were in diapers during the last bear of l972-74 and they deduct the sudden break of 1987 as one aberration. What it quantities to is they have not mind of what to do while the brown material kicks the flare.

It is a disgrace namely brokers are no taught the basics of how to defend clients?money and same goes as reciprocal fund managers. Scores of reciprocal asset went out of commerce during the last damage and others were preoccupied by their huge brothers in massive fund families.

The mart seldom breaks as it did in 1987 and normally erodes away as it did in 1972-74. Current investors have not been told approximately secular bull and secular bear markets thonce and for all approximately 16 to 18 years in each way. During those down or at best sideways periods investors are happy to break even. This is a historical truth that you tin retard behind for a hundred years.

If we are in this 16 years down that started in 2000 do you have a blueprint as to what to do to protect your monetary well being? Most people don? and they refuse to adopt the idea that anything like another wastage of 80% can happen. Brokers don? have a plan. Fund managers don? have a plan. Do you have a plan? If you don? it is time to start considering how you can protect what you have now. The most essential entity about any investment is not to lose money.

The market today has the latent for different 2000 break. Now is the time to protect your investments. Get your stocks and mutual funds out and whether you have anyone that have lost more than 10 or even 20% from their maximum amount it would be advisable to sell them and remain in cash. NASDAQ 800 may not be far away.

Al Thomas' writing,franklin marshall, "If It Doesn't Go Up,abercrombie, Don't BuyIt,abercrombie milano!" has assisted thousands of people make moneyand reserve their profits with his simple 2-stepmethod. Read the 1st chapter at and detect why he's the male that Wall Streetdoes not absence you to know.

         Copyright 2005

[返回上一页] [打 印]Related articles：

• http://www.220932.com/home/space.php?uid=10557&do=blog&id=136327
• http://alumni.statru.org/index.php?p=blogs/viewstory/98460

The U.S. Commerce Department confirmed Wednesday that it would be launching an investigation into Chinese solar subsidies and trade practices, in response to a petition filed by seven U.S. solar manufacturers last month. This trade dispute could lead to steep duties on imports of Chinese panels and help struggling domestic manufacturers. The U.S. International Trade Commission will examine the issue and vote on December 5th. However, some U.S. solar companies are against the dispute, counting on importing cheap panels to boost solar power generation. Meanwhile, China’s Ministry of Commerce says it's "greatly concerned" by the latest developments, and the measure could jeopardize bilateral cooperation on energy issues. It's also warned that if the U.S. takes any anti-dumping measures against Chinese solar suppliers, it will hurt U.S. exports of equipment and raw materials to China. China also fired something of a warning shot today, saying it retains its right to adopt corresponding measures, within the framework of the WTO.