It is understood that the beginning of 2006 to the end of 2007 , the defendant Zheng Fen deposit to loan-sharking , investment real possession and other affair needs money stream and other grounds , to 20-70 per daytime per million dollars of lofty amuse as tempt , was the economic by borrowing and joint ambition approximate another defrauding victims Huang Moumou 15 people of extra than 100 million yuan for overspending , gambling, and others were Moumou economic alliances associations, resulting in the detriment of huge amounts of money , inability to compensate . Among them,new g star,ugg boots aboard marketing a pseudonym, only Huang Moumou was fraudulent 45.575 million yuan . Yellow deception,north face shoes, but also for of his own crime of illegal deposits from the public was held .

2008年4 23,leger bandage dress, yelin the absnece of the court trial,gstar shirts, told his brother Huang , Zheng Fen exist or may flee apt Shanghai ,authentic herve leger, Zhengzhou , and asked Huang to aid detect the money to come behind . Hwang has been kept driving above the outdoor seeing Zheng Fen . At 0:20 on May 25, 2008 Xu , Hwang Helen Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai Zheng deposit chess chamber to find amusement, and seized and rotated over to the public security bureau.

in the trial, debated in court the amount of Fen Zheng deposit only 20 million yuan,gore tex northwardly face Chaoyang District Court, the public security apparatuses before his disloyal confession . The defendants argued that Zheng 's behaviour did not encounter the fiscal fraud of a crime , and illegal deposits from the public in line with the crime of Elements , illegal deposits from the public shall be convicted and punished for its sins .

court held that the deceit indictment identified Fen Zheng deposit amount namely based on Zheng and Huang Moumou additional storeroom fun were the victims in accordance with 15 victims and accustomed along Zheng Fen deposit arrears owed ​​, along to the reconciliation , confirmed at either parties amount of funding ought be identified as the amount of fraud , so Zheng Fen court for the amount of deposit is merely $ 20 million to defend and support on the chapter of the amount of the alleged absence of evidence the defense can no be built attitudes . The defenders on the combination of the crime of unlawful deposits from the public comments and the barricade does not mate the facts and the law ,north face for kids, not be admissible. Zheng Fen defendant kept a huge amount of guilt and the interests of the state and the folk had a particularly heavy losses , highly solemn crimes , should be severely punished according to statute . Then made the decision . (End )