defendant pointed out, December 24, 2008, in Zhengzhou, Zhang Bin about worked to Macau for gambling. Li Bin, said there is no agreeable pass, you tin make the king responsible for the West to the Macau casino bets, and Zhang in their hostel shrieked king of the West, told him that charge, and charge digit of village or engaged, winning or losing by three human funded by the gambling divided in proportion. 3 people in the three million Hong Kong dollars in gambling, Zhang provided 200,000 Hong Kong dollars, king of the West invested 500,000 Hong Kong dollars, Li Bin provided 2.3 million Hong Kong dollars. 3 After the dispute, King traveled to the West that is Macau.
trial lasted three hours, the court did not in court for sentencing.
withheld because 15 days, fined $ 1000 discipline. whether the police jurisdiction
[the plaintiff] has no legal root for administrative punishment
gambling in Macao, mainland citizens whether the violation is not illegal? Public security apparatuses, including three people, including Dr. Zhang detained for 15 days and recovered to win by betting money combined 11.3 million Hong Kong dollars in the end is not valid? With in-depth tread by tread, the trial, the defendant in the incipient facts of the case either in the fierce battle of words show the elementary contour.
Li Bin, the third person that the penalty decision made by the defendant was bad of fact, the third human had yet made it clear that human behavior is the third investment prefer than gambling money, and the third person's acts not in the Republic of China Mainland, the defendant based aboard the Administrative Punishment Law to punish the third person is not appropriate.
plaintiff agents Carter, the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau quickly diametrically disapproved to the agent replied: case, the three gambling behavior in the Mainland to complete the consultation, funding is completed in the Mainland Wang behavior of each bet the west by the plaintiff and the third was decided that three people have co-financing and tangible allocation money for gambling behavior is composed of ingredients, and their participation in gambling is based on profit. plaintiff's conduct in the Mainland by telephone form, and are in the Mainland of gambling. Macau bets to implement their own behavior,abercrombie fitch clothes, but the three people's behavior can not be separated, is a entire act.
The site is no a casino,northwardly face women s jackets Students were die in gang fights afterward the, but the location is the king of the West acts casinos in Macau, so his action is not gambling.
plaintiff [defendant] gambling facts are clear
legitimate rights and interests, so inquiring the court to revoke the administrative penalty decision.
the meanwhile, the king of the West has went with the accuser and Li Bin in Guangzhou had tel adjoin. December 31, 2008, king of the West back to Guangzhou after the Zhang and Li Bin, together with the Guangzhou City Public Security Bureau Detention. July 3, 2009, defendant withdrew three of the culprit case, elevating heaving bail,abercrombie & fitch store, to return the bail bond. July 7, 2009, the defendant and the three people made the determination, each of the three people detained for 15 days and fined 1,000 yuan, accumulation of
the defendant that the plaintiff's behaviour telephone betting behavior, by 1:00 on December 27,kids north face jacket,northwardly face jacket marketing Warren deceit crooks posing for investors 770,, Zhang and Li Bin began talking on the phone with the hotel stationery in the form of a draft disc of the case of gambling gambling 11 o'clock in the morn has been bet, win extra than 100 million Hong Kong dollars. 3 bet to December 31, 2008 morning, ten hours a daytime Candu, each bet is generally 50,000 Hong Kong dollars to 600,000 Hong Kong dollars range,herve sale,dark uggs 2 foreigners arrested because narcotic trafficking seriously injured j, using casino chips, probably won the 1100 million dollars.
the past, these words emerge alone, is ample to attract the attention of the. Today, in Beijing Chaoyang District People's Court, entire of the words are strings together. Dr. of public concern in governmental detention in the case of Macau gambling opened the trial of the huge shade.
defendant argued namely the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau, Zhang, Wang Xi, Li Bin, the Macau casino joint stock bets at telephone, contained in unlawful gambling truths are explicit and sufficient evidence.
agency of the plaintiff beyond joined that the Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau identified three co-won the 11.3 million Hong Kong dollars is not correct, it is independently of the King of the West. King of the West's behavior took place in Macau, China Public Security Administration Punishment Law is merely valid in the Republic of China Mainland, there is no private achieve. So far, there has been no special law to regulate our citizens offshore gambling behavior.
plaintiffs said in the indictment,classic tall ugg boots, in December 2008, it was punished with two other co-Wang West (pseudonym), Li Bin (a pseudonym) to argue co-invested 300 million to Macau for gambling. December 26, 2008, king of the West an exit to the Star World Hotel Macau gambling. King of the West in a three million Hong Kong dollars on credit casino chips Candu, brought the money is not accustomed.
14:00 pm, ahead commencing the trial, the court has packaged the broad third, in counting to amuse some people, the Beijing University Law School a collective organization likewise came to observe.