In November, Shaoguan City Court that the Provincial Prosecutor's Office can not deny the conclusions of the original handwriting expert conclusions, should be upheld.

court the same day, Zhang, Lu shouted the second person wronged. Zhang said that he did with the beauty community supermarket bosses have been arguing, was due to open at their booths in ten supermarket, the United States followed in the supermarket opposite the open society,louboutin pas cher, that the two sides of the highly competitive supermarket owner, requiring suppliers only between the two supermarkets in Zhang said he has not grudge, then decided to switch to bottled water to do business. Until they were taken away by police, he did not know beauty community regarding the bombs being put in the supermarket, as the crime situation, investigators are in the Lu Guomin also considered the case.

9 years ago,学生午休时间翻单杠摔残 法院一审判学校不担责 Morning News reporters Duo Fang and Tiao Chaque found that the tragedy actually is likely to be due to a dispute in an online chat ... ..., two men charged with conspiracy to bomb the supermarket, is an explosive offense (attempted) sentence. 9 years later, they have served their sentences in prison, the awful past cases of aging caused by Guangdong Provincial Procuratorate attention. After review, the Provincial Procuratorate many doubts exist that the case, the existing evidence is insufficient to sentence two men convicted requirements cassation protest thereon. On Friday,男子在网上购药被骗3150元 Morning News reporters Duo Fang and Tiao Chaque found that the tragedy actually is likely to be due to a dispute in an online chat ... ..., the Guangdong Provincial High Court retrial in the court case.

retrial focus

in prison and released from prison,abercrombie and fitch, Zhang, Lu complaint two times, in 2003 11 Shaoguan City Procuratorate on file for review of the case, the main evidence of the conviction that the explosive device in handwriting is threatening letter written by Zhang Liang,abercrombie and fitch, delegate to the Guangdong Provincial Procuratorate Technology Department re-appraisal, appraisal concluded that the threatening note left on the sheets is not Liang and Lu Guomin handwriting. In October 2004, Shaoguan City Procuratorate to change the main evidence for a conviction, facts of the case is unclear, the grounds of insufficient evidence, the proposed Shaoguan City Court for retrial.

vista ​​p>

threatening note handwriting with new findings

intern Wu Hongming

I must also be fair

in the retrial court, that the province's Procuratorate, the case mainly rely on two of Zhang Lu's guilt confession conviction, other circumstantial evidence,abercrombie, physical evidence,casque dr dre, the lack of documentary evidence. In addition, Zhang, Lu and two in the trial after trial, the confession is repeated many, of which two key facts are unclear, the lack of evidence: First, on explosives, detonators source situation, and they confessed only after repeated contradictory, but also inconsistent with the-spot situations; The second is to send a bomb, why were the fact that the caller is unclear,abercrombie france, according to Zhang, the public security organs in the land of two interrogation transcripts show, Zhang admitted that its looking for the first a person who does not know the explosives to the United States and the community supermarket, and later said the confession was Lu Guomin of finding people to send the explosives, he did not know, and Zhang Lu Guomin claimed is to find someone to get the explosives.

attempted murder of two men jailed in the explosion

critical facts are not clear can not be convicted

Zhang and Lu Guomin (both his real name) is the case the defendant. In 2001, when he was 27-year-old Zhang Liang Huang Gang in Shaoguan City,casque beats, opened a small supermarket kiosks miles, when he was 30-year-old Lu Guomin was a supermarket across the United States and the social security.

2008 年 5 19, Shaoguan City Procuratorate to a second trial, guilty verdict, Lu-explosive offense (attempted) the fact that lack of clear evidence,louboutin, made the guilty verdict on two grounds of error, to Guangdong Provincial Procuratorate filed protest.

old cases repeat

through the investigation after the trial, Zhang, Lu Guomin explosion of conspiracy regarding the supermarket society beauty confessed, and a bomb attached to a note by the identification of Shaoguan City Public Security Bureau, Zhang also wrote, after the two Wujiang court was explosive offense (attempted) were sentenced to eight years and seven years. Both pleaded not appeal, Shaoguan City Court after the court rejected the appeal upheld the conviction.

Shaoguan City, Wujiang District Court ruling stated, January 2, 2001 afternoon,abercrombie, it was the system of good explosive device disguised as a gift to the United States and the community supermarket office, the staff found the gift receipt box there is a note that read: Subsequently,polo ralph lauren, it was called this gift box is the bomb. The agency immediately to report the U.S. supermarket. Investigation of police found that Zhang and beauty competition in the business community Zengyin supermarket boss fight, and Lu Guomin of social Ren Baoan in the United States when he was detained by police to non-official ban on customers, the supermarket owner, resentment, this will be two people as a major suspect object.

Zhang said the incident occurred, aroused great concern,Muck truck rollover crushed tricycle vehicle escape hawkers Morning News reporters Duo Fang and Tiao Chaque found that the tragedy actually is likely to be due to a dispute in an online chat ... ..., hurry to the local police solve the case he thinks wronged her.

this regard, the Provincial Procuratorate that the case can be made between the available evidence confirm each other, can not identify Zhang, Lu duo carried out criminal acts, the trial court convicted two errors should be abolished.

■ Express reporter Huang Q

2010 年 8 13, the Guangdong Provincial High Court retrial in the court case.

parties said