 |
Updated: 2010-06-23 07:56 2010-06-23 07:56:58.0Xu LiTime US gave the yuan a breakchina-us,money,wto,lisseur babyliss,imf,rule,sanction,chanel homme,countervailing measures,trade,yuan11011501Op-Ed Contributors2@webnews/enpproperty-->
WTO multilateral trade rules invest the legislative realm for measures apt address trade discussions, and the lawful deed the US is questing to restrict China is no in line with the WTO rules.
The issue of China's diplomatic commute machinery has remained above the political agenda of the US fall butme years immediately and has popped up at times, eroding bilateral ties. Since the beginning of this annual,louboutin chaussures, the US has been urgent China to revaluate the yuan. Some US senators profess that its foreign exchange rate has been operated to reserve the yuan's value low.
Related readings:
Yuan drops 2nd day behind policy adjustment
China expands pilot program of yuan settlement
Yuan mushrooms to 5-year lofty against dollar
Markets rally on yuan policy
WTO multilateral trade rules provide the legislative realm for measures to address trade disputes, and the legal action the US is seeking to restrict China is not in line with the WTO rules. The WTO anti-dumping rules are aimed at imposing sanctions against dumping by personal parties. The countervailing rules are aimed at sanctioning against member states providing unlawful subsidies to their specific industries.
In China, the foreign exchange mechanism is decided by the administration and has nobody to do with private parties. Since personal parties in all industries have to follow this foreign exchange preparation, no specific manufacture can be identified as the heir of a "special currency management".
Besides, China does not tie its foreign exchange policy to its backup sector's performance, and importers and exporters emulate the same exchange policy.
Currency manipulation is a legal term in the IMF's Articles of Association which governs the relationship among the IMF and its member states, and does not seem in the WTO framework. The IMF has the legal power to impose sanctions on its member states that contravene the Articles of Association, which means member states do not have the right to impose sanctions on every other for violation of the Articles of Association.
So the US has no right to levy restrictions on other IMF membership states for currency manipulation. If it does so,burberry outlet, it would override the IMF's jurisdiction. On the other hand, the IMF won't delegate its judicial administration to member states. So America's restrictive action opposition China's currency regime can't be justified beneath WTO rules,chanel outlet, even though the WTO gives direction to IMF decisions on foreign exchange matters.
In essence, America's proposed legal action against China on the currency issue tin be narrated for one venture to use trade cure weapons offered by the WTO to curb the so-called violations of the IMF liabilities. In act so,ralph lauren, the US is overriding the IMF's judicial right, increasing China's duties under the WTO to include the IMF liabilities,bottes pas cher, and abusing its trade cure right under the WTO.
Though the WTO pursues free trade,chanel sac, its new rules reflect a blend of free trade and trade protection. Apart from the trade remedy rights, WTO rules provide member states with various other protective means which constitute exceptional provisos, such as the balance of disbursement exception that allows a member to restrict imports if its equilibrium of payment sinks into a critical situation.
Besides, the discriminatory China-specific trade measures in the WTO rules unfortunately push the WTO toward the protectionist alley and give other member states a better opportunity of guarding against imports from China.
We can't assist wondering why the US doesn't resort to entire the protective, or even protectionist weapons that the current WTO framework offers to settle the so-called Chinese currency problem it has been severely criticizing.
The likely answer is that either the US is not satisfied with the present weapons or it does not enable for such weapons and that it absences a fashionable weapon, easy to use and effective than ever.
What we ambition see next is the US hesitating to sue China in WTO,bottes ugg, and prefering sanctions in its own territory or bilateral negotiations when required.
The inventor is adviser of Policy Review Division,Mulberry bags, Beijing WTO Affairs Center.
(China Daily 06/23/2010 page9)
Related articles：
