 |
psychiatric medicine is an experience. On whether a person is sick and what disease, different doctors may come to different conclusions. The scenario is likely much larger than the other clinical. A person legally recognized as mentally ill, can he and his relatives and other people or society have an important impact. Therefore, the legal process should be determined strictly on mental restrictions, non-legal due process and legitimate right of the ruling, citizens have not considered the rights of mental patients, a psychiatrist, rather than relying on a paper diagnostics.
Jiashan County Court hearing that the food companies and federations have behavioral and subjective harm is at fault, the plaintiff Wang Wei's personal interests have been violated and whether there was damage to his person and property, the fact that is the case,Doudoune Moncler Magasin, the focus of controversy.
food company made a tit for tat reply: First, Wang Wei is suffering from psychosis splitting caused by its own, because of its split in 2001 into psychosis Third Hospital of Huzhou City, which is their access to disabled card has existed before, and not the company's fault. Food companies also presented to the court August 24, 2001, September 26, October 12,Moncler Doudoune, a copy of the voucher recipients 1 to prove that Wang Huzhou due to (psychiatric hospital) treatment of a doctor by his father three second unit to receive a total of 6000 yuan to the petty cash.
the experience of Wang Wei and bizarre twists and turns. According to his story, November 2001, he was the inauguration of Jiashan, a food industry and trade companies, without the consent of the case, together with his father secretly Jiashan County Disabled Persons' Federation to declare for the mentally disabled, he has been kept in the dark,Doudoune Moncler Homme, go home until March of this year inquiry, the Committee was informed. He believes this is a tort, is its character, ability, and other aspects of the overall credit denial, and their lives, work had a profound long-term negative impact.
the case of Italy
because Wang has always emphasized this to the employment of disability card blocked,moncler sito ufficiale, the defendant Foods Corporation has conducted a fierce rebuttal.
daily life and find work in the eye has always been the face of discrimination know the truth, can not find steady work, life has been minimal at the level of line ...
sued the company and the CDPF's complaint, the company requested the court to order compensation for disability compensation, are dependent for living expenses,Doudoune Moncler, moral damages solatium Total 677,515.80 yuan, and asked Jiashan County Disabled Persons' Federation jointly and severally liable.
Wang cited the issue: In 2008, he attended a labor recruiting agencies examination, he was the first written exam and passed the interview, but meet the political, because the company said it has intermittent mental illness , leading to political examination is brush.
CDPF and the other defendants, said: disabled card is disabled and the type of disability assessment, level of legal documents, persons with disabilities to enjoy the preferential policies for state and local governments an important credential. Who meet the Chinese Disabled Persons' practical assessment standards In October 2001, disabled persons under the Third People's Hospital of Huzhou City, diagnosis, identified four plaintiffs with mental disabilities, and to its first-generation disability certificates issued, the fact is clear, therefore, asking the court rejected Wang's claim.
□ is the case
Recently, Jiashan County court verdict, dismissed the right of personality damage on Wang Wei's claim.
according to our laws, harm behavior, there is the fact that the presence of damage, harm and damage behavior of a causal relationship between the fact that the perpetrator subjective fault, and must also have these factors, the infringement can be established. Has examined the facts show that the disability card for just a proof of Wang Wei's mental state, rather than harm behavior, food companies, and federations of subjective fault and there is no harm behavior, does not constitute infringement.
same law also provides that the parties put forward their own ideas, have the responsibility to provide evidence, the evidence provided by the plaintiff Wang Wei to prove the defendant's conduct can not be right to their personal property damage caused.
Related articles：
