(Reporter Wang Qiang) because the author of This a.m., the East Court of First Instance ruling aboard the case, the lifting of the plaintiff and the defendant Beijing Sheng Shi Mengqi with Kam Culture Co., Ltd. signed the

Shimeng Qi, 38, the end of 2008 louis vuitton women damier canvas natural cowhide straps inside patch with the louis vuitton signature zippered inside pocket with a d-ring n51106, he proposed to set up online company.

Shi Mengqi charged that in November 2009 he wIt’s about time the Beijing Culture Co., Ltd Kam Sheng-signed with the partnership agreement to co-host from 2010 to 2012 three-year After the signing of the contract louis vuitton scarves sophisticated 044, the defendant agreed not to open a special account in accordance with, the relevant sponsorship into account the defendant, the defendant violated agreement later the detention of sponsorship money, and the massive losses the floor essential the plaintiff to recompense. 2010, the plaintiff in mandate to ensure Plaintiffs query to proceed the contract, and compensation for economic losses of $ 10,000.

accused Beijing Culture Co., Ltd Kam Sheng court with a counterclaim, mentioning that bilateral cooperation in strict obedience with the contract phase, the inverse is the plaintiff in a serious gap of the contract period, without permission extra than 30 million sponsorship fee charged. Company filed a countersuit with Kam Sheng, Shi Mengqi necessitated remittance according to the proportion of accession defendant sponsorships, alms and other income allocation, the substantial cost of the defendant to disburse expenses of $ 13 million louis vuitton handbags in a luxuriously ornate handcrafted leather handle used for carry m40259, and as the lifting of the two sides signed the contract.

tribunal held that either the incipient defendant in the clutch to advocate. Both the original defendant claimed economic losses, there is not testify. Final court decision to lift the 2 sides of the compact, dismissed the original defendant's other claims. Both the original defendant did no signify if the plea court.

welcome to annotate to remark