ten minutes later,mercurial vapor, Marseille was again brought to court. Full Court first announced, defense counsel requested the transfer of public security organs of evidence apply, the key is not the case, none of the three requirements for approval.

In other words,Chaussure de foot, regardless of whether an appeal of Marseille, on March 9 this year,doudoune moncler, he will be out of the detention center.

cross-examination, the lawyer then easy to apply to the court for three points. The first is to apply for the first time to spend in Marseille after the incident around the police investigation and media Masai mother and neighbors to understand the mental state at the time of Marseille. Second,Christian Louboutin, the lawyers said in Marseille, police received two police inquiries the same day. However,ralph lauren, there is no record of inquiry into the first volume. Marseille can not prove the subjective intent.

Committee of Beijing Lawyers Association, Secretary-General Li Xiaolin Criminal Procedure Law, the facts; for no commercial intent of defamation, listen to others to pass rumors and spread false facts as well as the fact that a degree of hypocrisy processing behavior and did not cause significant damage, and no serious episodes of the situation would not be recognized as guilty. product reputation, and hope that the result of, or laissez-faire.

court held that the Marseille fabricated and spread false facts, damage to his business reputation, product reputation, serious behavior, violation of the operator's business reputation, product reputation right, constitutes damage to business reputation, product reputation for crime. Masai Ming spreading false facts known through the media make public the relevant companies and their products under the premise of a wrong understanding, still to the news media interested in concealing the truth and fabricating false facts, objectively serious damage to the reputation of the relevant companies and their products and reputation, these qualify as business reputation, product reputation constitute a crime, what motivation does not affect Marseille for identification of the nature of their behavior. Ultimately, the court sentenced Marseille one year imprisonment,polo ralph lauren, a fine of 1,Migrant workers to pick up gold bracelets place so,000 yuan.

a lie sentenced to a year

9 时 40 points, the case reopened. Marseille to the Coca-Cola Company in order to prove economic loss caused, the prosecution submitted a foreign language documents and instructions in Chinese invoice copy. Coca-Cola Company to track after the fact to the media,网帖曝高校要求大学生恋爱实名登记, consumer surveys, legal advice,Chaussures de football, please foreign experts, advertising and other investment totaling 200 million yuan.

fallback provision sentenced Marseille

though counsel is not aware that Marseille was poisoned,louboutin pas cher, but also without the knowledge of the case, said in a lie, and did not damage the reputation of Coca-Cola Company's subjective intent. However,14 -year-old boy made ​​603 for primary entrance does not ad, according to the expression decision, the Court continues to believe that,Chaussures de foot, Masai Ming lies the public will know he made judgments Sprite problem, but still lied.

Subsequently, the judge in court for sentencing.

Marseille hear told the judge: p>

moon prison sentence Marseille 3

It can be seen, if the court to determine guilt Marseille, should first confirm that Marseille have damage to business reputation and product reputation intentional.

Yi Sheng Hua defense lawyer immediately said that these losses are indirect losses. And these losses occurred in the two Sprite mercury poisoning, these losses are not calculated in Marseille head.

focus of subjective intent matter?

this morning, court was convicted and jailed for a year and fined 1,000 yuan.

Marseille I really do not know is poisoning

from defense counsel's application for transfer of evidence and statements can be seen Marseille, Marseille, whether they want to discredit the Sprite repeatedly emphasized the subjective intent. So,大学生入职体检白细胞偏高遭拒录起诉被驳回, subjective intent is really so important?

After listening to the views of both parties, the Full Court adjourned the ten minutes to deliberate,louboutin, after a further hearing evaluation.

criminal law for the damage to business reputation, product reputation of crime identified the need for major losses or serious circumstances. In this regard, the judicial interpretation of the corresponding regulations. The first is the direct victim losses of 50 million. The second is a serious impact on production and management, leading to shutdown or bankruptcy. Coca-Cola from the current evidence does not seem in line. The third is the use of the Internet or other media damage to business reputation. The last is the In fact,Ralph Lauren Polo, Marseille convicted because of this fallback provision. And

sit on court interpretation to understand the reasons for the decision of Marseille. This is the reason for your court. reputation effects, and this is the reason convicted Marseille.